State v. Williams
This text of 108 So. 3d 255 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|/We find no error in the trial court’s ruling on Reginald Williams’ “Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence,” inter alia, because the relator, State of Louisiana, acknowledges that under Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d [256]*256407 (2012), the automatic imposition of life imprisonment without benefit of parole for a murder conviction of a defendant who was a juvenile at the time of the offense violates the U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.1 Miller is retroactive to cases that were final in Louisiana at the time the decision in Miller was rendered by application of the per curiam in State v. Simmons, 11-1810 (La.10/12/12), 99 So.3d 28.
SUPERVISORY WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 So. 3d 255, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1604, 2013 WL 84902, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-lactapp-2013.