State v. Williams

108 So. 3d 255, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1604, 2013 WL 84902, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 7, 2013
DocketNo. 2012-K-1604
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 108 So. 3d 255 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Williams, 108 So. 3d 255, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1604, 2013 WL 84902, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1 (La. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.

|/We find no error in the trial court’s ruling on Reginald Williams’ “Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence,” inter alia, because the relator, State of Louisiana, acknowledges that under Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d [256]*256407 (2012), the automatic imposition of life imprisonment without benefit of parole for a murder conviction of a defendant who was a juvenile at the time of the offense violates the U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.1 Miller is retroactive to cases that were final in Louisiana at the time the decision in Miller was rendered by application of the per curiam in State v. Simmons, 11-1810 (La.10/12/12), 99 So.3d 28.

SUPERVISORY WRIT DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re: Michael Morgan
Eleventh Circuit, 2013
Falcon v. State
111 So. 3d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 3d 255, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1604, 2013 WL 84902, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-lactapp-2013.