In re: Michael Morgan

717 F.3d 1186, 2013 WL 2476318, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11756, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 341
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 10, 2013·No. 13-11175·Published·Cited by 24 cases

Opinions

[1187] BY THE COURT:

The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Michael Morgan, 717 F.3d 1186, 2013 WL 2476318, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11756, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 341 (11th Cir. 2013).

717 F.3d 1186 (In re: Michael Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Michael St. Hubert
918 F.3d 1174 (Eleventh Circuit, 2019)
King v. United States
202 F. Supp. 3d 1346 (S.D. Florida, 2016)
Ziglar v. United States
201 F. Supp. 3d 1315 (M.D. Alabama, 2016)
Davis v. McCollum
798 F.3d 1317 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
LaMonte Martin v. Jessica Symmes
782 F.3d 939 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
Scott v. United States
81 F. Supp. 3d 1326 (M.D. Florida, 2015)
Curtis Croft v. Tarry Williams
773 F.3d 170 (Seventh Circuit, 2014)
Williams v. State
183 So. 3d 198 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2014)
State v. Mantich
Nebraska Supreme Court, 2014