State v. Williams

36 So. 111, 111 La. 1033, 1904 La. LEXIS 594
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 29, 1904·No. No. 15,127·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss the Appeal.

BREADX, J.

The ground of the motion to dismiss is that the record contains neither bill of exception nor assignment of error.

The state, in this case, complains of the order of the trial judge which sustained a motion made in arrest of judgment.

It is true, as alleged, that there was no bill' of exception taken, and no assignment of error filed on the part of the state, hut there was a- motion in arrest of judgment filed and overruled.

The motion in arrest is confined, as to grounds, to defects of law apparent on the face of the record.

It follows that, without a bill of exception or formal assignment of error, the points of law on the motion in arrest are before us on appeal.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 36 So. 111, 111 La. 1033, 1904 La. LEXIS 594 (La. 1904).

36 So. 111 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Middleton
275 So. 3d 440 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019)
State of Louisiana v. Charles Middleton
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019
State v. Ware
84 So. 2d 56 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1955)
State v. Lewis
165 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
State v. Mullins
116 So. 393 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
State v. Anderson
114 So. 598 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
State v. Kemp
97 So. 475 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)
State v. Hunley
72 So. 376 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
State v. Joiner
55 So. 560 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1911)
State v. Peterman
46 So. 672 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)
Lisso & Bro. v. Giddens
41 So. 1029 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)