State v. Wilkins

359 S.W.3d 538, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 192, 2012 WL 548868
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 21, 2012
DocketED 96124
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 S.W.3d 538 (State v. Wilkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wilkins, 359 S.W.3d 538, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 192, 2012 WL 548868 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larshon Wilkins (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first-degree robbery and two counts of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to cross-examine him about statements that he made to police in which he claimed to have witnessed unrelated robberies and homicides.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. State
359 S.W.3d 538 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 S.W.3d 538, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 192, 2012 WL 548868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilkins-moctapp-2012.