Hale v. State

359 S.W.3d 538, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 199, 2012 WL 548930
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2012·No. ED 96227·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Billie Hale (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted by a jury of six counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, three counts of first-degree child molestation and two counts of first-degree statutory. rape. Movant was sentenced to consecutive terms of twenty years, life, ten years, and life imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hale v. State, 359 S.W.3d 538, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 199, 2012 WL 548930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

359 S.W.3d 538 (Hale v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wilkins
359 S.W.3d 538 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)