State v. Whitby

975 So. 2d 1124, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 90, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 143
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 7, 2008·No. No. SC06-420·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of this case, Whitby v. State, 938 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), on the basis of the district court’s certification of a question of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. However, upon reflection and further consideration we have determined to deny review and discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs with an opinion, in which ANSTEAD and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

CANTERO, J., dissents with an opinion, in which WELLS and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Whitby, 975 So. 2d 1124, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 90, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 143 (Fla. 2008).

975 So. 2d 1124 (State v. Whitby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida v. Geovani Johnson
Supreme Court of Florida, 2020
Tavares W. Spencer, Jr. v. State of Florida
238 So. 3d 708 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
Tommy West v. State of Florida
168 So. 3d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Hayes v. State
94 So. 3d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Welch v. State
992 So. 2d 206 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
State v. Whitby
975 So. 2d 1124 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)