State v. Wheat

191 P.3d 812, 222 Or. App. 94
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 20, 2008
Docket060532721 A133460
StatusPublished

This text of 191 P.3d 812 (State v. Wheat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wheat, 191 P.3d 812, 222 Or. App. 94 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

191 P.3d 812 (2008)
222 Or. App. 94

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
David Allen WHEAT, Defendant-Appellant.

060532721; A133460.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted May 28, 2008.
Decided August 20, 2008.

Kenneth A. Kreuscher, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services.

Jeremy C. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge, and CARSON, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Maiden, 222 Or.App. 9, 191 P.3d 803 (2008); State v. Willis, 219 Or.App. 268, 182 P.3d 891 (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Willis
182 P.3d 891 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Maiden
191 P.3d 803 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Wheat
191 P.3d 812 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 P.3d 812, 222 Or. App. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wheat-orctapp-2008.