State v. Webb

2 N.C. 120
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Webb. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 N.C. 103
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1794·Published

Opinion

But per curiam,

Judge Ashe and Judge Williams

These authorities do not say that depositions taken in the absence of tiie prisoner shall be read, and our act of Assembly 1715, ch 16, dearly implies the depositions lobe read, must be taken in his presence : it is a rule, of the common law, founded on natural justice, that no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross examine ; and though it he insisted that the. act intended to make an exception in this instance, to the rule of the common law, yet the act lias not expressly said so, and we will not, by implication, derogate from the salutary rule established by the common law. So the deposition was rejected.

Note. — Vide Philips on Evidence, 299, and see whether the English practice upon this subject is founded upon principles that ought to be adopted in this country.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Webb, 2 N.C. 120 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).

2 N.C. 120 (State v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.