State v. . Webb

2 N.C. 103
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1794
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 2 N.C. 103 (State v. . Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Webb, 2 N.C. 103 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).

Opinion

(104) These authorities do not say that depositions taken in the absence of the prisoner shall be read, and our act of Assembly, 1715, ch. 16, clearly implies the depositions to be read must be taken in his presence. It is a rule of the common law, founded on natural justice, that no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross-examine; and though it be insisted that the act intended to make an exception, in this instance, to the rule of the common law, yet the act has not expressly said so, and we will not, by implication, derogate from the salutory rules established by the common law.

So the deposition was rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lester
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2023
Doe v. Brandeis University
177 F. Supp. 3d 561 (D. Massachusetts, 2016)
State v. McLaughlin
786 S.E.2d 269 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)
Chavez v. State
213 P.3d 476 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2009)
Rankins v. Commonwealth
237 S.W.3d 128 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Jensen
2007 WI 26 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2007)
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
548 U.S. 557 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Davis v. Washington
547 U.S. 813 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Contreras v. State
910 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
344 F. Supp. 2d 152 (District of Columbia, 2004)
State v. Lewis
603 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Crawford v. Washington
541 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.C. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-webb-ncsuperct-1794.