State v. . Webb

183 S.E. 367, 209 N.C. 302, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 467
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 22, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

As the defendant neither sought nor accepted the indulgence and forbearance of the court, it was error to withhold final judgment, or some judgment in its nature final, so that the defendant might test the validity of the trial by appeal. Such was the holding in S. v. Burgess, 192 N. C., 668, 135 S. E., 771. Hence, on authority of the Burgess case, supra, the cause will be remanded for judgment. Compare S. v. Anderson, 208 N. C., 771; S. v. Rooks, 207 N. C., 275, 176 S. E., 752.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Webb, 183 S.E. 367, 209 N.C. 302, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 467 (N.C. 1936).

183 S.E. 367 (State v. . Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Griffin
100 S.E.2d 49 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
State v. . Jackson
36 S.E.2d 706 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)