State v. . Rooks

176 S.E. 752, 207 N.C. 275, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 443
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 31, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 176 S.E. 752 (State v. . Rooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Rooks, 176 S.E. 752, 207 N.C. 275, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 443 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Stacv, C. J.,

after stating the case: The appeal must be dismissed as unavailing to the defendant in the present state of the record. S. v. Polk, 91 N. C., 652.

It is provided by C. S., 4650, that the defendant shall have the right to appeal in case of “conviction in the Superior Court for any criminal offense,” etc. Appeals in criminal cases are controlled by the statutes on the subject; and it was said in S. v. Webb, 155 N. C., 426, 70 S. E., 1064, “that an ordinary statutory appeal will not be entertained except from a judgment on conviction, or some judgment in its nature final.” S. v. Lyon, 93 N. C., 575; S. v. Hinson, 82 N. C., 540; S. v. Jefferson, 66 N. C., 309; S. v. Bailey, 65 N. C., 426; William Biggs, ex parte, 64 N. C., 202.

We may add, however, that it is not after the practice of the courts, ex mero- motu, to declare acts of the General Assembly void or unconstitutional. It is only in the exercise of judicial power, properly invoked, that such action is taken. Blackmore v. Duplin County, 201 N. C., 243, 159 S. E., 354; McPherson v. Motor Sales Corp., Ib., 303, 160 S. E., 283; Poore v. Poore, Ib., 791, 161 S. E., 532; Wood v. Braswell, 192 N. C., 588, 135 S. E., 529; Person v. Doughton, 186 N. C., 723, 120 S. E., 481.

The order of remand, therefore, should be stricken out.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Howard
320 S.E.2d 17 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
State v. Black
172 S.E.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Perry
119 S.E.2d 865 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
State v. . Inman
31 S.E.2d 641 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
State v. . King
22 S.E.2d 241 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
State v. . Cox
2 S.E.2d 370 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Richardson Realty, Inc.
191 S.E. 410 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
State v. . Hiatt
189 S.E. 124 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
State v. . Webb
183 S.E. 367 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
State v. . Blades
182 S.E. 714 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Anderson
182 S.E. 643 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E. 752, 207 N.C. 275, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rooks-nc-1934.