State v. Watson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Watson

397 S.W.3d 539, 2013 WL 1736515, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 482

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 23, 2013

DocketNo. ED 98193

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 397 S.W.3d 539 (State v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Watson, 397 S.W.3d 539, 2013 WL 1736515, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 482 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Watson appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Watson appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

397 S.W.3d 539, 2013 WL 1736515, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-watson-moctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack