State v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Taylor

824 S.W.2d 957, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 487, 1992 WL 47529

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 1992

DocketNo. 59145

StatusPublished

This text of 824 S.W.2d 957 (State v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Taylor, 824 S.W.2d 957, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 487, 1992 WL 47529 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

824 S.W.2d 957, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 487, 1992 WL 47529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-taylor-moctapp-1992.