State v. Watson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Watson

959 S.W.2d 937, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 110, 1998 WL 21752

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1998

DocketNo. 71581

StatusPublished

This text of 959 S.W.2d 937 (State v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Watson, 959 S.W.2d 937, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 110, 1998 WL 21752 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Watson, Defendant, appeals the judgment entered pursuant to his jury conviction for second degree burglary and stealing over $150. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent terms of 381 days. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find sufficient evidence to support the jury convictions. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Watson, Defendant, appeals the judgment entered pursuant to his jury conviction for second degree burglary and stealing over $150. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent terms of 381 days. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find sufficient evidence to support the jury convictions. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

959 S.W.2d 937, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 110, 1998 WL 21752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-watson-moctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack