State v. Watkins

649 S.E.2d 896
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 27, 2007
Docket119A07
StatusPublished

This text of 649 S.E.2d 896 (State v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Watkins, 649 S.E.2d 896 (N.C. 2007).

Opinion

649 S.E.2d 896 (2007)

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Percell WATKINS, Jr.

No. 119A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Percell Watkins, Jr.

Philip Lehman, Assistant Attorney General, Joel H. Brewer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 640 S.E.2d 409.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th day of March 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007." HUDSON, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Watkins
640 S.E.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
649 S.E.2d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-watkins-nc-2007.