State v. Washington

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Washington

166 P.3d 575, 214 Or. App. 467, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1137

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 15, 2007

Docket050545423; A130430

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 P.3d 575 (State v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Washington, 166 P.3d 575, 214 Or. App. 467, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1137 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, ORS 166.240. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal. According to defendant, the knife he was carrying was not a “dirk” or “dagger” for purposes of the statute. The state concedes that, under State v. McJunkins, 171 Or App 575, 15 P3d 1010 (2000), the evidence was insufficient to support defendant’s conviction. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, ORS 166.240. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal. According to defendant, the knife he was carrying was not a “dirk” or “dagger” for purposes of the statute. The state concedes that, under State v. McJunkins, 171 Or App 575, 15 P3d 1010 (2000), the evidence was insufficient to support defendant’s conviction. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 P.3d 575, 214 Or. App. 467, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-washington-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack