State v. Washington
166 P.3d 575, 214 Or. App. 467, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1137
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 15, 2007·No. 050545423; A130430·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, ORS 166.240. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal. According to defendant, the knife he was carrying was not a “dirk” or “dagger” for purposes of the statute. The state concedes that, under State v. McJunkins, 171 Or App 575, 15 P3d 1010 (2000), the evidence was insufficient to support defendant’s conviction. We agree and accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Washington, 166 P.3d 575, 214 Or. App. 467, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1137 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
166 P.3d 575 (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Washington
166 P.3d 575 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)