State v. Washington

262 So. 2d 393, 262 La. 125, 1972 La. LEXIS 4765
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 La. 233
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 30, 1972·No. No. 52440·Published

Opinion

HAMLIN, J.,

is of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is correct. He has not abused his discretion.

SUMMERS, J., is also of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is correct. The reasons assigned for granting this writ without hearing in this unclear area of the law can only serve to further obscure the proper guidelines to which a trial judge must adhere.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Washington, 262 So. 2d 393, 262 La. 125, 1972 La. LEXIS 4765 (La. 1972).

262 So. 2d 393 (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.