State v. Washington

258 So. 2d 378, 260 La. 1128, 1972 La. LEXIS 5729

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 La. 233 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 3, 1972·No. No. 52235·Published

Opinion

In re: Evariste V. Washington applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Application denied. No showing has been made to warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction. See March 2, 1972 return of Orleans Parish Grand Jury.

BARHAM, J., and TATE, J., concur in the denial of all writs.

The Grand Jury indictment for aggravated rape shown by the return makes the preliminary examina[1129]*1129tion for probable cause and bail previously raised moot. Adequate remedy by appeal is afforded in all other issues in the event of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Evariste V. Washington applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Application denied. No showing has been made to warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction. See March 2, 1972 return of Orleans Parish Grand Jury.

BARHAM, J., and TATE, J., concur in the denial of all writs.

State v. Washington, 258 So. 2d 378, 260 La. 1128, 1972 La. LEXIS 5729 (La. 1972).

Pincite

258 So. 2d 378 (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.