State v. Warren

302 S.W.3d 784, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 138, 2010 WL 431251

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Warren. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 333 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 9, 2010·No. No. WD 70278·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Phillip Warren appeals a conviction for the sale of a controlled substance near a school, section 195.214. He argues that it was prejudicial error for the State’s informant-witness to testify about the reason for leaving Columbia, Missouri, and [785]*785that the State failed to prove an essential element of the crime.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Warren, 302 S.W.3d 784, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 138, 2010 WL 431251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

302 S.W.3d 784 (State v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.