State v. Warren

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Warren

302 S.W.3d 784, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 138, 2010 WL 431251

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 9, 2010

DocketNo. WD 70278

StatusPublished

This text of 302 S.W.3d 784 (State v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Warren, 302 S.W.3d 784, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 138, 2010 WL 431251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Phillip Warren appeals a conviction for the sale of a controlled substance near a school, section 195.214. He argues that it was prejudicial error for the State’s informant-witness to testify about the reason for leaving Columbia, Missouri, and [785]*785that the State failed to prove an essential element of the crime.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Phillip Warren appeals a conviction for the sale of a controlled substance near a school, section 195.214. He argues that it was prejudicial error for the State’s informant-witness to testify about the reason for leaving Columbia, Missouri, and [785]*785that the State failed to prove an essential element of the crime.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 S.W.3d 784, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 138, 2010 WL 431251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-warren-moctapp-2010.