State v. Warren

33 Me. 30
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1851·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The inquiry should not have been, what the house was designed for, or was capable of being, but whether it was then a dwellinghouse.

To constitute a building a dwellinghouse, it must be a habitation for man, and usually occupied by some person lodging in it at night, though such occupant may for a time be absent, leaving furniture therein, with a,n intention of returning. 4 Black. Com. 224; 1 Leech, 185; 2 Russell, 914, 922.

Under an intimation from the Court that the instructions were erroneous, and could not be sustained, the Attorney General entered a nol. pros., and the defendant was discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Warren, 33 Me. 30 (Me. 1851).

33 Me. 30 (State v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vickers
291 S.E.2d 599 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
Simmons v. State
129 N.E.2d 121 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1955)
Desroches v. McCrary
24 N.W.2d 511 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1946)
State v. Morris
163 P. 567 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Scott v. State
62 Miss. 781 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1885)