Scott v. State

62 Miss. 781
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Arnold, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The building as described by the testimony was not a dwelling-house in legal contemplation. To render a building a dwelling-house it must be a habitation for man, and usually occupied by some person lodging in it at-night. A building which is in fact a dwelling-house does not lose its character as such by a mere temporary absence of its inhabitants who have left with intent to return, but it does not become a dwelling-house, though used for taking meals and other purposes, unless the person occupying it or some one of his family or servants usually sleep in it at night. Bish. Stat. Crimes, § 279; Ex parte Vincent, 26 Ala. 145 ; State v. Warren, 33 Maine 30.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 62 Miss. 781 (Mich. 1885).

62 Miss. 781 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chad Bowman v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2019
Giles v. Commonwealth
658 S.E.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2008)
Carr v. State
770 So. 2d 1025 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2000)
Washington v. State
753 So. 2d 475 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 1999)
Gillum v. State
468 So. 2d 856 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1985)
George Ralph James, Jr. v. United States
238 F.2d 681 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
Carrier v. State
89 N.E.2d 74 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1949)
Haynes v. State
177 So. 360 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1937)