State v. Waltenburg
This text of 422 P.3d 433 (State v. Waltenburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*434*235Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine and driving under the influence of intoxicants. Defendant argues that the trial court committed plain error when it ordered him to pay $186 in court-appointed attorney fees because the record contains no evidence of defendant's ability to pay them.1 The state concedes that, under State v. Below ,
Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay court-appointed attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
422 P.3d 433, 293 Or. App. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-waltenburg-orctapp-2018.