State v. Waltenburg
Opinion
*434*235Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine and driving under the influence of intoxicants. Defendant argues that the trial court committed plain error when it ordered him to pay $186 in court-appointed attorney fees because the record contains no evidence of defendant's ability to pay them.1 The state concedes that, under State v. Below ,
Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay court-appointed attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
422 P.3d 433 (State v. Waltenburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.