State v. Waltenburg

422 P.3d 433, 293 Or. App. 234
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 1, 2018·No. A164759·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*434*235Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine and driving under the influence of intoxicants. Defendant argues that the trial court committed plain error when it ordered him to pay $186 in court-appointed attorney fees because the record contains no evidence of defendant's ability to pay them.1 The state concedes that, under State v. Below , 264 Or. App. 384, 387-88, 332 P.3d 329 (2014), and State v. Pendergrapht , 251 Or. App. 630, 634, 284 P.3d 573 (2012), the trial court plainly erred in imposing $186 in attorney fees. We agree that the trial court committed plain error, accept the state's concession, and conclude that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error in this case because of the gravity of the error and the lack of any evidence of financial resources.

Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay court-appointed attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Waltenburg, 422 P.3d 433, 293 Or. App. 234 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

422 P.3d 433 (State v. Waltenburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Pendergrapht
284 P.3d 573 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)
State v. Below
332 P.3d 329 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)