State v. Walsh, No. Cr-95-237607 (Sep. 26, 2000)
This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12142-ac (State v. Walsh, No. Cr-95-237607 (Sep. 26, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application for Review of Sentence imposed by the Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury.
Docket Nos. CR-95-237607, CR 95-237613
Robert Burke, Esq. Defense Counsel, for the Petitioner.
Cara Eschuk, Esq. Assistant States Attorney, for the State.
Sentence: AFFIRMED.
As to the second victim (DOB 8/9/94) the petitioner was convicted of Sexual Assault in the 4th Degree and Injury or Risk of Injury to a Minor.
The trial court imposed a net effective sentence of 40 years incarceration, execution suspended after 25 years incarceration with 35 years of probation. It is this sentence petitioner seeks to have reviewed.
Counsel for Petitioner indicated to the Division that the trial court did not have the benefit of the petitioner's input in the Pre-sentence Investigation report in light of the fact that petitioner absented himself from the jurisdiction. Counsel for petitioner stressed the fact that the petitioner's criminal history reflects a 10 year span where no criminal activity is indicated. Counsel seeks reduction to a net effective sentence of 20 years execution suspended after 10 years to be followed by a period of probation.
The petitioner declined the opportunity to address the Division.
Counsel for the State stressed that the effect upon each of the child/victims was immense. Counsel noted that the trial court indicated at sentencing that the court was not going to consider the outstanding charge of Failure to Appear in the First Degree in the sentencing of the petitioner.
It is noteworthy that the petitioner was convicted of four counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of C.G.S. §
The Division need not elaborate on the vulnerability of children and the long lasting effect the acts of the petitioner could have on their lives.
Pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book §
The Division is without authority to modify sentences except in accordance with the provision of Connecticut Practice Book §
In reviewing the records as a whole, the Division finds that the sentencing court's actions were in accordance with the parameters of Connecticut Practice Book §
The sentence imposed was neither inappropriate or disproportionate.
The sentence is AFFIRMED.
___________________, J. Miano ___________________, J. Klaczak ___________________, J. Norko
Miano, J., Klaczak, J., and Norko, J. participated in this decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 12142-ac, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-walsh-no-cr-95-237607-sep-26-2000-connsuperct-2000.