State v. Walker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 366 S.C. 643
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided March 12, 2008·No. 2008-UP-166·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Walker, Jr., Appellant.


Appeal From York County
 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-166
Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 12, 2008   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Kenneth Walker, Jr. pled guilty to armed robbery, burglary first-degree, attempted armed robbery, conspiracy to commit armed robbery, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine within proximity of a park.  Walker was sentenced to twenty-three years for armed robbery, twenty-three years for first-degree burglary, twenty years for attempted armed robbery, five years for conspiracy to commit armed robbery, ten years for possession with intent to distribute, and ten years for possession with intent to distribute within proximity of a park, all to run concurrently.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Walker’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Walker did not file a pro se response.  After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Walker, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

State v. Walker (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)