State v. Walker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 366 S.C. 643
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided July 14, 2008·No. 2008-UP-384·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Marvin Walker, Appellant.


Appeal From Charleston County
 James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-384
Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 14, 2008  


APPEAL DISMISSED


Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Walker appeals his guilty plea of two counts of armed robbery.  On appeal, Walker’s counsel alleges the plea did not meet the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Walker’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Walker, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

State v. Walker (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)