State v. Wabash Railway Co.

17 N.E. 909, 115 Ind. 466, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 369
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 18, 1888
DocketNo. 14,283
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 17 N.E. 909 (State v. Wabash Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wabash Railway Co., 17 N.E. 909, 115 Ind. 466, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 369 (Ind. 1888).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The record shows that the Wabash Railway Company is in the hands of a receiver appointed by the circuit court of the United States, and that the servants of the receiver constructed a platform across what had once been a public street, but which, it is claimed, had been vacated. It is only necessary for us to decide, that where a corporation is in the hands of a receiver, who has full possession of its. property and entire charge of its affairs, the corporation can not be prosecuted for crimes or misdemeanors committed by the agents or servants of the receiver. As the corporation can do no act while the receiver is in full control, it can commit no offence. This seems so clear as not to require discussion. Ohio, etc., R. R. Co. v. Davis, 23 Ind. 553 (85 Am. Dec. 477); Bell v. Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co., 53 Ind. 57., We need not inquire or decide whether a corporation is liable to a criminal prosecution for the acts of its agents or servants in obstructing a highway, for here the wrong charged against the corporation was not committed by the corporation, but by an officer of the Federal court placed in charge of the corporate affairs.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Murray
174 Misc. 251 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1940)
Echols v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
178 S.E. 139 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Van Stone
119 N.E. 874 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1918)
Willson v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.
142 P. 174 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1914)
State v. . R. R.
67 S.E. 42 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
State v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.
152 N.C. 785 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
People v. Potter
3 Ill. Cir. Ct. 393 (Illinois Circuit Court, 1908)
Schurr v. Omaha & St. Louis Railway Co.
67 N.W. 280 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1896)
Memphis & C. R. v. Hoechner
67 F. 456 (Sixth Circuit, 1895)
State v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway
35 N.E. 700 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Godfrey v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.
18 N.E. 61 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 N.E. 909, 115 Ind. 466, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wabash-railway-co-ind-1888.