State v. W. W.
205 P.3d 62, 227 Or. App. 279, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 168
Opinion
In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is unable to provide for his basic needs. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. W. W., 205 P.3d 62, 227 Or. App. 279, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 168 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
205 P.3d 62 (State v. W. W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Ww
205 P.3d 62 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)