State v. W. W.

205 P.3d 62, 227 Or. App. 279, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 168
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 1, 2009
Docket070970206; A137082
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 P.3d 62 (State v. W. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. W. W., 205 P.3d 62, 227 Or. App. 279, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 168 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is unable to provide for his basic needs. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Ww
205 P.3d 62 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 P.3d 62, 227 Or. App. 279, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-w-w-orctapp-2009.