In the Matter of Ww
Opinion
In the Matter of W.W., aka J.W., aka J.D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
W.W., aka J.W., aka J. D., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Daniel J. Casey filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Rolf C. Moan, Acting Solicitor General, and Denis M. Vannier, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is unable to provide for his basic needs. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
205 P.3d 62 (In the Matter of Ww) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.