State v. W. C.

274 P.3d 312, 249 Or. App. 176, 2012 WL 1060057, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 385
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 28, 2012·No. 101172176; A147319·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. W. C., 274 P.3d 312, 249 Or. App. 176, 2012 WL 1060057, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 385 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

274 P.3d 312 (State v. W. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Wc
274 P.3d 312 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)