In the Matter of Wc
Opinion
In the Matter of W.C., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
W.C., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Rebecca Carter filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Cecil A. Reniche-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(e). *313 The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
274 P.3d 312 (In the Matter of Wc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.