State v. Von Mincy

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Von Mincy

2010 Ohio 924, 124 Ohio St. 3d 549

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

Docket2009-1439

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2010 Ohio 924 (State v. Von Mincy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Von Mincy, 2010 Ohio 924, 124 Ohio St. 3d 549 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinions

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio St.3d 365, 2010-Ohio-1, 922 N.E.2d 923, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with State v. Underwood.

[550]*550Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent. Cupp, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Underwood.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio St.3d 365, 2010-Ohio-1, 922 N.E.2d 923, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with State v. Underwood.

[550]*550Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent. Cupp, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Underwood.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2010 Ohio 924, 124 Ohio St. 3d 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-von-mincy-ohio-2010.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack