State v. Visintin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Visintin. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 Haw. 143
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 25, 2018·No. SCWC-14-0000391·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000391 25-MAY-2018 08:00 AM

SCWC-14-0000391

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

SHAWN D. VISINTIN, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000391; CR. NO. 13-1-0166)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 10, 2018, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 25, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Visintin, (haw 2018).

State v. Visintin (State v. Visintin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.