State v. Visintin
This text of State v. Visintin (State v. Visintin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000391 25-MAY-2018 08:00 AM
SCWC-14-0000391
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
STATE OF HAWAII, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
SHAWN D. VISINTIN, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000391; CR. NO. 13-1-0166)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on April 10, 2018, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 25, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Visintin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-visintin-haw-2018.