State v. Vasel

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Vasel

47 Mo. 444

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedMarch 15, 1871

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 47 Mo. 444 (State v. Vasel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vasel, 47 Mo. 444 (Mo. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Currier, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding under the statute for extortion. The case is not distinguishable in principle from that of State v. [445]*445Vasel, ante, p. 416. There was testimony tending to prove the material allegations of the complaint, which well warranted the result reached by the court. No instructions were asked or given on either side.

The objections to the complaint sought to be raised by the motion in arrest, if of force at all, are not available under that motion, and the judgment will be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Currier, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding under the statute for extortion. The case is not distinguishable in principle from that of State v. [445]*445Vasel, ante, p. 416. There was testimony tending to prove the material allegations of the complaint, which well warranted the result reached by the court. No instructions were asked or given on either side.

The objections to the complaint sought to be raised by the motion in arrest, if of force at all, are not available under that motion, and the judgment will be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 Mo. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vasel-mo-1871.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack