State v. Vann
This text of 2017 ND 275 (State v. Vann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[¶ 1] James Vann appealed from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of four counts of terrorizing under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-04(1). Vann argues the evidence was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdicts for terrorizing, because there was insufficient evidence that he intended to place other persons in fear of their life or he recklessly disregarded the risk of causing that fear and there was insufficient evidence that he threatened to commit a crime of violence or an act dangerous to human life. We conclude the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, is sufficient to support the convictions for all four counts of terrorizing, and we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 275, 904 N.W.2d 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vann-nd-2017.