State v. Vanhook

88 Mo. 105
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Henry, C. J.

The defendant was.indicted and convicted for selling beer on Sunday. He has appealed from the judgment of the circuit court, and the only error assigned which we deem it necessary to notice, is the failure of the record to show any arraignment of the defendant, and “this, under repeated adjudications, must accomplish the reversal of the judgment.” State v. Ja[106] ques, 68 Mo. 260 ; 53 Mo. 234. After the jury is sworn and the trial proceeds, and all the testimony relates to' the guilt or innocence of the accused, in a misdemeanor case, it looks like trifling with j nstice to reverse the judgment, because the record fails to show an arraignment and plea of not guilty; but it has been held in a number of cases that this is a fatal error, and it is for the legislature, and not for this court to change the law on the subject. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vanhook, 88 Mo. 105 (Mo. 1885).

88 Mo. 105 (State v. Vanhook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Trabbold
91 A.2d 537 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1952)
State v. Poynter
205 P. 561 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)
State v. O'Kelley
167 S.W. 980 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
Burroughs v. State
143 N.W. 450 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1913)
State v. O'Kelley
157 S.W. 1055 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
State v. Walton
91 P. 490 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1907)
State v. Ambrose
102 S.W. 590 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Dansby v. United States
51 S.W. 1083 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1899)
Browning v. State
74 N.W. 631 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Gaines v. United States
1 Indian Terr. 296 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1895)
United States v. Molloy
31 F. 19 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri, 1887)