State v. Vanderhorst
This text of 2012 Ohio 5759 (State v. Vanderhorst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Vanderhorst, 134 Ohio St.3d 592, 2012-Ohio-5759.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. VANDERHORST, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Vanderhorst, 134 Ohio St.3d 592, 2012-Ohio-5759.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Williams. (No. 2012-1303—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 7, 2012. APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 97242, 2012-Ohio-2762. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Williams, 134 Ohio St.3d 482, 2012-Ohio-5699, ___ N.E.2d ___. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL, J., dissents. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kristen L. Sobieski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Nathaniel McDonald, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 5759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vanderhorst-ohio-2012.