State v. Van Meter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Van Meter

284 S.W.3d 780, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 773, 2009 WL 1590614

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2009·No. ED 91890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the sale of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior and persistent drug offender and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the sale of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior and persistent drug offender and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Van Meter, 284 S.W.3d 780, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 773, 2009 WL 1590614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

284 S.W.3d 780 (State v. Van Meter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related