Carson v. State

284 S.W.3d 780, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 790, 2009 WL 1590677
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 2009
DocketED 91736
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 284 S.W.3d 780 (Carson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carson v. State, 284 S.W.3d 780, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 790, 2009 WL 1590677 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Carson appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. Finding no clear error in the motion court’s ruling, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Van Meter
284 S.W.3d 780 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 S.W.3d 780, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 790, 2009 WL 1590677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carson-v-state-moctapp-2009.