State v. . Utley

35 S.E. 428, 126 N.C. 997, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 349
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 20, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 35 S.E. 428 (State v. . Utley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Utley, 35 S.E. 428, 126 N.C. 997, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 349 (N.C. 1900).

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.

The defendant is indicted for attempting to poison another by placing phosphorus and a poisonous substance in a coffee pot. After the conviction the defendant moved for an arrest of judgment, because the bill did not charge that the defendant had knowledge of the deadly character* of the substance alleged to b-ei poisonous. This averment was held not to be essential in State v. Slagle, 88 N. C., 630.

The defendant also asked his Honor to instruct the jury .to render a verdict of not guilty on the ground that there was not sufficient evidence to submit to the jury, which prayer was overruled. We have carefully read the evidence, and think that there was evidence to go to the jury. The weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses were for the jury to consider, and not the Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Clyburn
159 S.E.2d 868 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Gay
110 S.E.2d 458 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
State v. Peacock
72 S.E.2d 612 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
State v. Hovis
64 S.E.2d 564 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
State v. . Brown
11 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
State v. . Hammonds
3 S.E.2d 439 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Smoak
195 S.E. 72 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
State v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.
188 S.E. 412 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
State v. . Eubanks
184 S.E. 839 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
State v. . Shipman
163 S.E. 657 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
State v. . Casey
159 S.E. 337 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
State v. . Burno
156 S.E. 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
State v. . McLeod
152 S.E. 895 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
State v. . McKinnon
150 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
State v. . Lawrence
146 S.E. 395 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
State v. . King
144 S.E. 518 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
State v. . Montague
141 S.E. 285 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
State v. . Sigmon
130 S.E. 854 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
State v. . Rountree
106 S.E. 669 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
State v. . Carlson
89 S.E. 30 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.E. 428, 126 N.C. 997, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-utley-nc-1900.