State v. Turner
2007 Ohio 6140, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1408
Opinion
Franklin C.P. No. 01CR-06-3615. On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prae.R. XI(6). Motion denied because the appellant failed to comply with the 90-day filing deadline in S.CtPrae.R. XI(6)(A).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Turner, 2007 Ohio 6140, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1408 (Ohio 2007).
2007 Ohio 6140 (State v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Henson
2024 Ohio 3137 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
State v. White, 90544 (8-21-2008)
2008 Ohio 4228 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Hill, 07ap-889 (8-21-2008)
2008 Ohio 4257 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Dickson, 2007-L-181 (5-2-2008)
2008 Ohio 2125 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Wiest, C-070609 (3-28-2008)
2008 Ohio 1433 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
Whipps v. Ryan, 07ap-231 (3-18-2008)
2008 Ohio 1216 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Osborne
116 Ohio St. 3d 1228 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
In re Gulley
879 N.E.2d 787 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Niepsuj v. Niepsuj
879 N.E.2d 787 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Harvey v. Austinburg Dev. Corp.
879 N.E.2d 787 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)