State v. Osborne

116 Ohio St. 3d 1228
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 2008·No. No. 2007-1597·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} Appellant has filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of the discretionary appeal in this matter, reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1413, 2007-Ohio-6140, 876 N.E.2d 970.

{¶ 2} The motion for reconsideration is granted. The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. V, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, and the cause is remanded.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Osborne, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1228 (Ohio 2008).

116 Ohio St. 3d 1228 (State v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones, 06 Ma 17 (2-20-2009)
2009 Ohio 794 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
State v. McGraw, 08ca3009 (11-21-2008)
2008 Ohio 6134 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Jones, 06 Ma 17 (6-26-2008)
2008 Ohio 3352 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)