State v. Osborne

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Osborne

116 Ohio St. 3d 1228

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 2008

DocketNo. 2007-1597

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 116 Ohio St. 3d 1228 (State v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Osborne, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1228 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} Appellant has filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of the discretionary appeal in this matter, reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1413, 2007-Ohio-6140, 876 N.E.2d 970.

{¶ 2} The motion for reconsideration is granted. The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. V, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, and the cause is remanded.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} Appellant has filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of the discretionary appeal in this matter, reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1413, 2007-Ohio-6140, 876 N.E.2d 970.

{¶ 2} The motion for reconsideration is granted. The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. V, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, and the cause is remanded.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 Ohio St. 3d 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-osborne-ohio-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack