State v. . Turner

65 N.C. 592
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1871·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Dick, J.

Where a person is found in possession of goods 'which have recently been stolen, there is a presumption of law .that he is guilty of the theft; and it is not necessary for the •State to show that any other suspicious circumstance accompanied such possession.

This presumption may be rebutted by the defendant, but if ,he does not satisfactorily account for such possession, by show-ring that he received the goods honestly, a jury ought to c'on.vict him of larceny. Roscoe 18; State v. Williams, 9 Ire. 140.

The charge of his Honor in this case, was more liberal than the law allows toward the defendant; and he has no right to ■complain.

. Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Turner, 65 N.C. 592 (N.C. 1871).

65 N.C. 592 (State v. . Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Williams
13 S.E.2d 617 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
State v. Swarens
241 S.W. 934 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)
State v. . McRae
27 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
Keating v. People
43 N.E. 724 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
Robinson v. State
3 S.W. 736 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1887)
Lehman v. State
18 Tex. Ct. App. 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)
Roberts v. State
17 Tex. Ct. App. 82 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1884)
Territory of Arizona v. Casio
1 Ariz. 485 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1884)
State v. Cassady
12 Kan. 551 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1874)