State v. Turner

22 S.W.3d 791, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, 2000 WL 1048277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 25, 2000·No. No. ED 76995·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David A Turner (Turner) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994,1 and one count of armed ■ criminal action, Section 571.015, for which he was sentenced to two twenty-five year terms to be served concurrently. Turner claims the trial court erred in admitting his confession without redacting a portion thereof and abused its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the claim of error to have no merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their own information [792]*792only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Turner, 22 S.W.3d 791, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, 2000 WL 1048277 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

22 S.W.3d 791 (State v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.