State v. Turner

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Turner

25 S.W.3d 677, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1302, 2000 WL 1218492

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2000·No. No. ED 76525·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[678]*678 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kim Turner, defendant, appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon her conviction by a jury of assault in the second degree, pursuant to Section 565.060 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015 RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[678]*678 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kim Turner, defendant, appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon her conviction by a jury of assault in the second degree, pursuant to Section 565.060 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015 RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Turner, 25 S.W.3d 677, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1302, 2000 WL 1218492 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

25 S.W.3d 677 (State v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related