State v. Turner

926 S.W.2d 180, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 1996 WL 330371
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 833
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 1996·No. Nos. WD 49937, WD 51465·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant’s direct appeal from his convictions of delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMO 1994, and possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMO 1994, is dismissed for abandonment because he failed to brief the direct appeal. Rules 30.06, 30.20. Movant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. This judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Turner, 926 S.W.2d 180, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072, 1996 WL 330371 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

926 S.W.2d 180 (State v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.