State v. Turner

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Turner

872 S.W.2d 668, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, 1994 WL 97732

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 731 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 1994·No. No. 60970·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lacey Turner, appeals from a jury verdict entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, finding him guilty of murder in the second degree, RSMo § 565.-021 (1986), and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1986). We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lacey Turner, appeals from a jury verdict entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, finding him guilty of murder in the second degree, RSMo § 565.-021 (1986), and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1986). We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

State v. Turner, 872 S.W.2d 668, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, 1994 WL 97732 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

872 S.W.2d 668 (State v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related