State v. Truelove
This text of 188 So. 2d 607 (State v. Truelove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Robert L. Truelove and Fred H. Truelove applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.
Writs refused. There are no perfected bills of exceptions. See LSA-R.S. 15:499; State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606; State v. Green, 245 La. 1081, 162 So.2d 573; State v. Spivey, 247 La. 719, 174 So.2d 132; State v. Bradford, 247 La. 720, 174 So.2d 132; State v. Polland, 247 La. 721, 174 So. 2d 132; State v. Amos, 247 La. 721, 174 So. 2d 132. Moreover, there is no error patent on the face of the recdrd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 So. 2d 607, 249 La. 619, 1966 La. LEXIS 2090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-truelove-la-1966.