State v. Polland

174 So. 2d 132, 247 La. 722
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 3, 1965·No. No. 47742·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Plant Polland applying for writs of prohibition and certiorari.

Writs denied. There are no perfected bills of exceptions. See La.Code of Crim. Proc. Art. 499, LSA-R.S. 15:499; State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568; State v. McDonald, 218 La. 198, 48 So.2d 797; State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606, 245 La. 187, 157 So.2d 733; and State v. Green et al., 245 La. 1081, 162 So.2d 573. Moreover, there is no error patent on the face of the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Polland, 174 So. 2d 132, 247 La. 722 (La. 1965).

174 So. 2d 132 (State v. Polland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Truelove
188 So. 2d 607 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1966)